Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
elinka
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Tags
Memories
Profile
elinka
one more article
one more article
Aug
.
16th
,
2010
05:54 pm
elinka
Mischief in Manhattan
We Muslims know the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation
By Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah, Citizen Special August 9, 2010
Last week, a journalist who writes for the North Country Times, a small newspaper in Southern California, sent us an e-mail titled "Help." He couldn't understand why an Islamic Centre in an area where Adam Gadahn, Osama bin Laden's American spokesman came from, and that was home to three of the 911 terrorists, was looking to expand.
The man has a very valid point, which leads to the ongoing debate about building a Mosque at Ground Zero in New York. When we try to understand the reasoning behind building a mosque at the epicentre of the worst-ever attack on the U.S., we wonder why its proponents don't build a monument to those who died in the attack?
New York currently boasts at least 30 mosques so it's not as if there is pressing need to find space for worshippers. The fact we Muslims know the idea behind the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation to thumb our noses at the infidel. The proposal has been made in bad faith and in Islamic parlance, such an act is referred to as "Fitna," meaning "mischief-making" that is clearly forbidden in the Koran.
The Koran commands Muslims to, "Be considerate when you debate with the People of the Book" -- i.e., Jews and Christians. Building an exclusive place of worship for Muslims at the place where Muslims killed thousands of New Yorkers is not being considerate or sensitive, it is undoubtedly an act of "fitna"
So what gives Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf of the "Cordoba Initiative" and his cohorts the misplaced idea that they will increase tolerance for Muslims by brazenly displaying their own intolerance in this case?
Do they not understand that building a mosque at Ground Zero is equivalent to permitting a Serbian Orthodox church near the killing fields of Srebrenica where 8,000 Muslim men and boys were slaughtered?
There are many questions that we would like to ask. Questions about where the funding is coming from? If this mosque is being funded by Saudi sources, then it is an even bigger slap in the face of Americans, as nine of the jihadis in the Twin Tower calamity were Saudis.
If Rauf is serious about building bridges, then he could have dedicated space in this so-called community centre to a church and synagogue, but he did not. We passed on this message to him through a mutual Saudi friend, but received no answer. He could have proposed a memorial to the 9/11 dead with a denouncement of the doctrine of armed jihad, but he chose not to.
It's a repugnant thought that $100 million would be brought into the United States rather than be directed at dying and needy Muslims in Darfur or Pakistan.
Let's not forget that a mosque is an exclusive place of worship for Muslims and not an inviting community centre. Most Americans are wary of mosques due to the hard core rhetoric that is used in pulpits. And rightly so. As Muslims we are dismayed that our co-religionists have such little consideration for their fellow citizens and wish to rub salt in their wounds and pretend they are applying a balm to sooth the pain.
The Koran implores Muslims to speak the truth, even if it hurts the one who utters the truth. Today we speak the truth, knowing very well Muslims have forgotten this crucial injunction from Allah.
If this mosque does get built, it will forever be a lightning rod for those who have little room for Muslims or Islam in the U.S. We simply cannot understand why on Earth the traditional leadership of America's Muslims would not realize their folly and back out in an act of goodwill.
As for those teary-eyed, bleeding-heart liberals such as New York mayor Michael Bloomberg and much of the media, who are blind to the Islamist agenda in North America, we understand their goodwill.
Unfortunately for us, their stand is based on ignorance and guilt, and they will never in their lives have to face the tyranny of Islamism that targets, kills and maims Muslims worldwide, and is using liberalism itself to destroy liberal secular democratic societies from within.
Raheel Raza is author of Their Jihad ... Not my Jihad, and Tarek Fatah is author of The Jew is Not My Enemy (McClelland & Stewart), to be launched in October. Both sit on the board of the Muslim Canadian Congress.
Profile
elinka
January
2012
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Most Popular Tags
2008
-
48 uses
2009
-
27 uses
2010
-
44 uses
ad
-
22 uses
art
-
74 uses
avital
-
57 uses
beautiful
-
32 uses
bo
-
118 uses
books
-
121 uses
catskills
-
35 uses
chanukkah
-
32 uses
cordoba center
-
23 uses
dacha
-
28 uses
dina
-
29 uses
elections
-
29 uses
financial crisis
-
21 uses
flickr
-
74 uses
fun
-
35 uses
funny
-
341 uses
ground zero
-
25 uses
holocaust
-
28 uses
humor
-
22 uses
israel
-
99 uses
joke
-
41 uses
lytdybr
-
36 uses
mili
-
89 uses
movies
-
84 uses
music
-
53 uses
neta
-
35 uses
news
-
31 uses
nyc
-
28 uses
pencils
-
22 uses
photo
-
205 uses
politics
-
74 uses
pu
-
26 uses
quote
-
26 uses
remembered
-
30 uses
russia
-
40 uses
spam
-
23 uses
terrorism
-
25 uses
video
-
35 uses
war
-
21 uses
writing
-
39 uses
youtube
-
27 uses
анекдот
-
74 uses
дети
-
21 uses
израиль
-
27 uses
одноклассники
-
24 uses
россия
-
53 uses
фразы
-
37 uses
Style Credit
Style:
Gray
for
Boxes and Borders
by
branchandroot
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 12:02 am
Powered by
Dreamwidth Studios